We also chronicled in “Climate Alarm On The Run” parts I and II about the Washington Post decision to cut its climate “reporting” team down to “five lonely reporters” and the elimination of the National Public Radio climate desk, which is “what happens when ‘journalists’ keep reporting about a dead horse.”
“Eventually,” we said, “the public realizes the horse has perished, and there’s nothing left to talk about. Or that there was no horse to begin with.”
Neither compulsive liars nor desperadoes give up easily. So it’s no surprise that the United Nations’ “principal judicial body,” the International Court of Justice, has issued an advisory opinion that “is not just any ordinary document, it is a living instrument that has the power to protect our climate for us now, and for the generations to come.”
The U.N. warns that “if States breach these obligations, they incur legal responsibility and may be required to cease the wrongful conduct, offer guarantees of non-repetition and make full reparation depending on the circumstances.”
Sorry, but this will never happen under President Donald Trump. And, hopefully, no subsequent Republican president will bend to the climate crackpots, grifters, anti-capitalists, social justice warriors and leftist radicals in general who make up the climate-calamity clan.
The next Democrat, however, will almost certainly bow to the U.N. court’s preferences minutes after taking office, scrambling in haste to submit to a spiteful tribunal while signaling their great virtue. Because in that White House, its occupants would believe that the junk science of global warming is real.
On this, the one-year anniversary of the court’s decree, the advisory opinion is being celebrated as a milestone that will “drive greater action on the environment,” “a living instrument that has the power to protect our climate for us now, and for the generations to come” and “holds transformative power to advance accountability.”
Meanwhile, not a word is said about the research of young meteorologist Chris Martz, who recently produced a telling chart that should embarrass everyone who blamed the hot summer weather during the World Cup on greenhouse gas emissions.
“The average number of days per year in the U.S. reaching 95” degrees was about “18% lower during the 60-year period 1961 to 2020 compared to 1901 to 1960,” says Martz, also known as the “anti-Greta Thunberg.” He further points out the the number of days the temperature reached 100 degrees and 105 degrees “have also declined since 1895.”
If the global warming tale were true, those data would be reversed.
We are aware that the U.S. is not the entire world. But when it gets hot or storms in America, the warming loyalists always use the country as a proxy for their claims that the planet is overheating, so we can do the same to counter their exaggerations. What we can’t match, though, is their fanaticism, because we deal in facts, which stand up to scrutiny far better than craziness.
— Written by the I&I Editorial Board
Support Independent Journalism
Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day — without fear or favor.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren’t afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.
We are 100% reader supported!!
If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.
And be sure to tell your friends!
I & I Editorial Board
The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
