Nevada Representative Dina Titus has introduced new federal bill in a bid to strengthen oversight of sports-related prediction markets. The proposal reflects growing concern that certain platforms may be operating in regulatory gray areas.
In a recent post on X, Rep. Titus expressed concern that some prediction market operators are exploiting loopholes in federal and state law. She argues that these platforms, while structured as financial trading exchanges, can function in ways that closely resemble traditional sportsbooks.
“Prediction markets should not be able to circumvent state gaming laws. Consumers deserve transparency, accountability, and protection against such predatory practices,” Titus wrote. “That is why I introduced the Fair Markets and Sports Integrity Act to prevent entities from engaging in transactions involving sporting or casino-style event contracts.”
The proposed Fair Markets and Sports Integrity Act would block companies from offering or facilitating trades tied to sporting events or casino-style outcomes if those contracts essentially mirror gambling products already regulated by states. The bill is designed to prevent platforms from repackaging sports betting as financial trading in order to avoid state gaming rules.
Titus, who represents a state deeply rooted in the regulated gaming industry, has long positioned herself as a defender of state-controlled sports betting systems. This latest proposal builds on her previous gaming-related efforts, including the Fair Bet Act, and reflects her broader concern that oversight hasn’t kept pace with the rapid expansion of new betting-style platforms.
Prediction markets debate isn’t limited to Nevada
In Hawaii, lawmakers have introduced legislation aimed at banning certain prediction markets amid concerns they operate like unregulated gambling. In Connecticut, Governor Ned Lamont has backed efforts targeting prediction platforms that may clash with the state’s existing sports wagering structure. Regulators in Washington have also moved to prohibit certain prediction market activities, arguing they violate state gambling laws.
Supporters of prediction markets say these platforms fall under federal commodities regulations and function more like forecasting tools than sportsbooks. Critics, including Titus and several state officials, argue that when contracts are directly tied to the outcome of a game, they look and feel a lot like traditional sports betting and should be regulated the same way.
Featured image: Dina Titus via X
The post Nevada Rep. Titus unveils prediction markets bill targeting sports loopholes oversight push appeared first on ReadWrite.
