French Town Accused of ‘Islamophobia’ Suffers ‘Goat Rape’ Crisis

I don’t make these stories. I just have to report them. And sometimes, I wish I didn’t have to.

Those who have been following Europe’s Islamization crisis (these days, America’s crisis as well) may remember the ‘Burkini’ flare up in France. Pennes-Mirabeau, a French town, barred Muslim women from going into swimming pools fully clothed in ‘Burkinis’ arguing that it was unsanitary.

The media rallied to defend the mandatory Islamic dress codes, which, as previously mentioned, having nothing to do with modesty (people who are actually modest don’t issue press releases or talk endlessly about their bathing suits) and accused Pennes-Mirabeau of ‘Islamophobia’.

Now some years later, Pennes-Mirabeau is in the news with likely more accusations of ‘Islamophobia’ coming after farm animals were sexually assaulted by an Afghan ‘refugee’.

A sordid affair has unfolded near Marseille. A 19-year-old man is suspected of raping goats and sheep in the town of Pennes-Mirabeau (Bouches-du-Rhône). An Afghan national, he was arrested on Friday, April 10, and taken into custody by the anti-crime brigade (BAC), according to information from La Provence and France 3 regions, confirmed by Le Figaro .

It was the sheep and goat owners in the town who alerted the authorities. Since the beginning of 2026, several of them had found some of their goats and sheep injured, particularly in February and March. The animals had their legs tied and showed signs of sexual abuse

After several similar incidents, the owners installed camera traps (motion-activated cameras) on their property in the hope of solving the mystery. They were horrified to discover the silhouette of a young man visiting their livestock.

He was arrested overnight between Thursday and Friday and taken into custody. An Afghan national, he faces up to three years in prison and a €45,000 fine for cruelty to a domestic, tamed, or captive animal.

But who are we to judge their culture?

There are some 100,000 Afghans who have invaded and still occupy parts of France.

France opened the door to Afghans with catastrophic results for both people and animals.

This movement is made possible by France’s relatively protective asylum system. In 2024, more than 70% of Afghans who applied for asylum were granted international protection (refugee or subsidiary protection), compared to less than 40% in some European countries.

The majority of Afghans arriving are young, male, poorly educated, and often struggle with language learning and professional integration. The social conservatism in Afghanistan, which migrants retain to some extent, is difficult to reconcile with French values, particularly on issues of freedom of conscience and women’s rights. This contrast is especially visible in the virtual absence of women among this migrant population: they represent less than 20% of exiles

More than 40% of those surveyed said they had never been to school. Nearly 19% of Afghans report having no more than a primary school education, and even a level lower than our primary school certificate, due to difficulties in reading and writing. And 10% cannot read or write in their mother tongue.

As a result, 18 months after they signed the CIR and the end of French language courses, 57% of them reported being unemployed.

A 2013 Pew Research Center study highlighted the difficulty of integrating Afghans, 99% of whom said they supported Sharia law and 85% supported stoning for adultery

German data show that, while Afghans accounted for only 0.5% of the population of Germany at the end of 2024, they were five times more likely to be charged with all offences recorded in that country in 2024 (2.3%)

In Germany, Afghans are 21 times more likely to be charged with sexual abuse of minors. They accounted for 10.5% of all such charges, compared with 0.5% of the general population; 16 times more likely to be charged with soliciting sexual acts from minors; 16 times more likely to be accused of pimping; 14 times more likely to be involved in the distribution, acquisition, possession and production of child pornography; 10 times more likely to be involved in violent offences against persons (‘crimes of brutality and crimes against individual freedom’).

These are young men who are not bringing their own women with them. So what does everyone think is going to happen? They’re going to prey on women and children and apparently even farm animals.

Letting in huge numbers of unaccompanied military age males is a decision by a nation to expose its women and children (and apparently farm animals) to sexual assault by the ‘refugee’ invaders.