Experimental randomness amplification – Nature

  • Colbeck, R. & Renner, R. Free randomness can be amplified. Nat. Phys. 8, 450–454 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giustina, M. et al. Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalm, L. K. et al. Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250402 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Santha, M. & Vazirani, U. V. Generating quasi-random sequences from semi-random sources. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 33, 75–87 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. W. History of RAND’s Random Digits: Summary Technical Report P113 (RAND, 1949); http://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P113.html.

  • von Neumann, J. John von Neumann Collected Works, Vol. 5: Design of Computers, Theory of Automata and Numerical Analysis 768–770 (Pergamon Press, 1961).

  • Colbeck, R. & Renner, R. No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power. Nat. Commun. 2, 411 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petrov, M. et al. Independent quality assessment of a commercial quantum random number generator. EPJ Quantum Technol. 9, 17 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A. & Adleman, L. A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun. ACM 21, 120–126 (1978).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Heninger, N., Durumeric, Z., Wustrow, E. & Halderman, J. A. Mining your Ps and Qs: detection of widespread weak keys in network devices. In Proc. 21st USENIX Security Symposium 205–220 (USENIX Association, 2012).

  • Lenstra, A. K. et al. Ron was wrong, Whit is right. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive https://eprint.iacr.org/2012/064 (2012).

  • RAND Coorporation A Million Random Digits with 100,000 Normal Deviates (American Book Publishers, 2001).

  • Bell, J. S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880–884 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, S. J. & Clauser, J. F. Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938–941 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell’s inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001).

  • Salart, D., Baas, A., Branciard, C., Gisin, N. & Zbinden, H. Testing the speed of ‘spooky action at a distance’. Nature 454, 861–864 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. & Arnon-Friedman, R. Device-independent randomness amplification and privatization. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inf. Theory 1, 568–584 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazirani, U. Strong communication complexity or generating quasirandom sequences form two communicating semi-random sources. Combinatorica 7, 375–392 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chor, B. & Goldreich, O. Unbiased bits from sources of weak randomness and probabilistic communication complexity. SIAM J. Comput. 17, 230–261 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M. et al. Certified randomness using a trapped-ion quantum processor. Nature 640, 343–348 (2025).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M. & Wallraff, A. Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storz, S. et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits. Nature 617, 265–270 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Portmann, C. & Renner, R. Security in quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 025008 (2022).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pütz, G., Rosset, D., Barnea, T. J., Liang, Y.-C. & Gisin, N. Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 190402 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandfuchs, M., Ferradini, C. & Renner, R. Randomness from causally independent processes. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05203 (2025).

  • Abellán, C., Amaya, W., Mitrani, D., Pruneri, V. & Mitchell, M. W. Generation of fresh and pure random numbers for loophole-free Bell tests. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250403 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurpiers, P. et al. Deterministic quantum state transfer and remote entanglement using microwave photons. Nature 558, 264–267 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurpiers, P., Walter, T., Magnard, P., Salathe, Y. & Wallraff, A. Characterizing the attenuation of coaxial and rectangular microwave-frequency waveguides at cryogenic temperatures. EPJ Quantum Technol. 4, 8 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Magnard, P. et al. Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, T. et al. Rapid high-fidelity single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 054020 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Magnard, P. et al. Fast and unconditional all-microwave reset of a superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 060502 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221–3224 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storz, S. et al. Complete self-testing of a system of remote superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 030801 (2025).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, A. & Mermin, N. D. Detector inefficiencies in the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3831–3835 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, P. H. Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. A 47, R747–R750 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, J.-A. Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism. J. Phys. A 47, 424003 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rukhin, A. et al. A Statistical Test Suite for Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications rev.1a (NIST, 2010); https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/random-bit-generation/documentation-and-software.

  • Marsaglia, G. & Tsang, W. W. Some difficult-to-pass tests of randomness. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v007.i03 (2022).

  • Kelsey, J., Brandão, L. T., Peralta, R. & Booth, H. A Reference for Randomness Beacons: Format and Protocol Version 2 Technical Report (NIST, 2019); https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8213-draft.

  • Kavuri, G. A. et al. Traceable random numbers from a non-local quantum advantage. Nature 642, 916–921 (2025).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, A. C. Protocols for secure computations. In 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1982) 160–164 (IEEE, 1982).

  • Goldreich, O., Micali, S. & Wigderson, A. How to play any mental game. In STOC ’87: Proc. Nineteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 218–229 (ACM, 1987); https://doi.org/10.1145/28395.28420.

  • Dodis, Y., Ong, S. J., Prabhakaran, M. & Sahai, A. On the (im)possibility of cryptography with imperfect randomness. In 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 196–205 (IEEE, 2004).

  • Nadlinger, D. P. et al. Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature 607, 682–686 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W. et al. A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users. Nature 607, 687–691 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ekert, A. & Renner, R. The ultimate physical limits of privacy. Nature 507, 443–447 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M.-H. et al. Test of local realism into the past without detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 080404 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. et al. Device-independent quantum random-number generation. Nature 562, 548–551 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Experimental low-latency device-independent quantum randomness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 010505 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shalm, L. K. et al. Device-independent randomness expansion with entangled photons. Nat. Phys. 17, 452–456 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M.-H. et al. Experimental realization of device-independent quantum randomness expansion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 050503 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W.-Z. et al. Device-independent randomness expansion against quantum side information. Nat. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01147-2 (2021).

  • Bierhorst, P. et al. Experimentally generated randomness certified by the impossibility of superluminal signals. Nature 556, 223–226 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W.-Z. et al. Toward a photonic demonstration of device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 050502 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hensen, B. et al. Loophole-free Bell test using electron spins in diamond: second experiment and additional analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 30289 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, W. et al. Event-ready Bell test using entangled atoms simultaneously closing detection and locality loopholes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 010402 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frauchiger, D., Renner, R. & Troyer, M. True randomness from realistic quantum devices. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.4547 (2013).

  • Portmann, C. & Renner, R. Cryptographic security of quantum key distribution. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3525 (2014).

  • Ferradini, C., Sandfuchs, M., Wolf, R. & Renner, R. Defining security in quantum key distribution. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13405 (2025).

  • Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V. & Wehner, S. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419–478 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661–663 (1991).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Acín, A. et al. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colbeck, R. Quantum And Relativistic Protocols For Secure Multi-Party Computation. PhD thesis, Univ. Cambridge (2009).

  • Pironio, S. et al. Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature 464, 1021–1024 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, R. Security of Quantum Key Distribution. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2005); https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005115027.

  • Tomamichel, M. & Hayashi, M. A hierarchy of information quantities for finite block length analysis of quantum tasks. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59, 7693–7710 (2013).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arnon-Friedman, R., Portmann, C. & Scholz, V. B. Quantum-proof multi-source randomness extractors in the Markov model. In 11th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2016), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs) Vol. 61 (ed. Broadbent, A.) 2:1–2:34 (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2016).

  • Dupuis, F., Fawzi, O. & Renner, R. Entropy accumulation. Commun. Math. Phys. 379, 867–913 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Metger, T., Fawzi, O., Sutter, D. & Renner, R. Generalised entropy accumulation. In 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 844–850 (IEEE, 2022).

  • Storz, S. Non-local Physics with Superconducting Circuits. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2023).

  • Related posts

    Meta launches WhatsApp ‘incognito’ mode to address privacy concerns for AI chats

    All 109 “Paradox Drive” Cards Revealed for “Pocket!” – PokeBeach

    Nintendo Expands Switch Online’s N64 Library With Another Game Next Week – Nintendo Life