As President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans seek to protect election integrity at the federal level with the SAVE America Act, Ohio is fighting its own battle.
Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union, representing the League of Women Voters of Ohio and CAIR-Northern Ohio, filed a lawsuit against Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose over the new Ohio election integrity law.
SB 293 was signed into law last December by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine and is set to go into effect next month. SB 293 uses citizenship data to purge suspected noncitizens from voter rolls.
But the ACLU claims that the law disenfranchises voters if they are purged from the voter rolls without ample time to correct issues.
It’s a lawsuit the secretary’s office claims is “frivolous.”
“Frivolous and unfounded lawsuits are nothing new for these groups. We are confident the legislation passed by the Ohio General Assembly complies with federal law,” Ben Kindel, press secretary for LaRose, told The Daily Signal.
“SB 293 directs Ohio’s secretary of state to systematically check and compare state voter registration data with the citizenship records of the state Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) and the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system. Individuals flagged under these citizenship-check requirements will have their voter registrations cancelled without prior notice or any opportunity to respond. These purges will take place at least once a month, continuing right up through elections,” League of Women Voters Ohio stated in a press release.
League of Women Voters Ohio claims the law is “problematic” because data is “outdated,” purging goes up to the eve of elections, and the law lacks “enough protection to ensure wrongly removed voters will be able to fix their registration in time to vote.”
“Once a green card holder goes through the naturalization process, they’re a citizen, and thus eligible to vote. But if they don’t update their driver’s license—which are valid for four to eight years, and new citizens aren’t required to update—according to the state of Ohio they still look like a noncitizen,” the Ohio Capital Journal also explained.
LaRose posted to X on Wednesday urging voters to act promptly if they’re asked to update or verify their information.
Accurate voter rolls matter, and I’m proud that we take it seriously in Ohio.
If your board of elections asks you to update or verify your info, it’s important that you respond promptly! If you don’t, it may impact your ability to have your vote count in future elections.…
— Frank LaRose (@FrankLaRose) February 18, 2026
“Instead of welcoming new voters who have gone to great lengths to participate in our democracy, SB 293 creates an unnecessary, discriminatory hurdle for naturalized citizens to cast their ballots,” said Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio. “Most Ohioans believe that democracy works best when we can all participate freely and fairly. That’s why we’re headed to court—to ensure that all eligible Ohioans can trust that their registrations won’t be cancelled.”
The Daily Signal reached out to plaintiffs and the ACLU but did not receive a response in time.
LaRose and League of Women Voters Ohio were involved in a back and forth over X on Thursday over the concern of noncitizens voting in elections.
What is the level of noncitizen voting where it would become unacceptable then for you? Are there other crimes you think I should ignore?
We’ve removed 1,048 noncitizens from the voter rolls in just the last 18 months. With 10 tie vote contests last year, any one of them… https://t.co/eZDCDk0Cfp
— Frank LaRose (@FrankLaRose) February 19, 2026
Honest Elections Project Action’s Vice President Chad Ennis, who provided testimony in favor of SB 293, warned about if plaintiffs should get their way.
“This lawsuit by the League of Women Voters and CAIR is another example of the Left attempting to foil any attempt at cleaning voter rolls. When the government has information from official sources that confirm someone is not a citizen, it would be terrible policy to allow that person to remain on the rolls and vote. But that is exactly what the lawsuit seeks to force Ohio to do,” he told The Daily Signal.
SB 293 includes other provisions. According to the bill’s text, its aim is “to modify the law governing, voter roll maintenance, provisional voting, the return of absent voter’s ballots, and the membership of the Ohio Election Integrity Commission.”
The legislation revises the deadline in which absent voter ballots can be returned, eliminating the grace period of four days after Election Day in which mail-in ballots can arrive.
The law was co-sponsored by state Sen. Theresa Gavarone, who stands by SB 293. “I believe in the legislation I sponsored. While this matter is pending, I won’t be commenting further,” she told The Daily Signal. “I trust the attorney general will be successful and that this law will be fully enacted.”
Heritage Action’s Paul Lagemann also testified in support of the bill, focusing on eliminating the grace period. In speaking with The Daily Signal, he shared that voters “should operate under that standard of having your ballot in on time,” stressing that a “consistent standard is the way to go.”
“Heritage has models on several of the issues in the bill, including voter ID and including other issues, such as citizen voting,” Lagemann said regarding other provisions in the bill, including those the lawsuit seeks to address.
While Congress tries to pass the SAVE America Act, which is regarded by Heritage Action as a “key vote,” Lagemann pointed to how states can also pass their own laws on election integrity. “The beauty of doing [election integrity] in the states is that we can do it quickly, thoroughly, and in a way that is tailored to the state,” he shared.
Ohio is currently tied at 11th among states in election integrity, according to The Heritage Foundation’s Election Integrity Scorecard, along with Mississippi, Texas, and Wisconsin.
