And, despite what the New York Times claims, interest in EVs is hardly “surging.” In fact, Kelley Blue Book reports that just 10% of car buyers said they were considering an EV in the first half of 2026, which is down from 11% the year before.
Instead, people are more drawn to hybrids, which are gas-powered cars that use batteries as range extenders. Hybrids now account for 15.4% of all new-vehicle sales, up 2.9 percentage points from a year ago. KBB found that interest in hybrids climbed to 22% in the first six months of this year compared with 20% in 2025.
But wait, there’s more. Interest in SUVs hit a record high of 71% in the first half of the year.
So, no, interest in EVs is not “surging,” and the EV market isn’t showing signs of a big “comeback.” They continue to be a niche product.
Want more evidence of consumers’ general disinterest in EVs?
Just about every automaker has pulled back from its bold plans to go all-electric after suffering massive losses. (See: “Are EVs The Biggest Boondoggle In Human History?”)
Ford itself has yet to deliver an EV that people want to own, after failing with its F-150 Lightning (discontinued), Mustang Mach-E (which saw sales collapse 50% in the first half of this year while the gas-powered version climbed), and E-Transit van (down 87%). In July, the automaker sold a mere 2,065 EVs. (Naming its latest entry “Fathom” is another potential misstep if consumers start asking, “Who could fathom buying that?”)
Subaru has been spending three times as much to promote its three electric cars as it does its gas-powered cars, but “sales have so far failed to live up to expectations,” reports Inside EVs. “The expenses have contributed to a 44% drop in the company’s operating profit in the first fiscal quarter that ended on June 30, going from $472 million last year to $263.2 million this year.”
So why do automakers keep throwing good money after bad? To appease the environmentalist lobby? For the halo effect? To protect foreign sales?
Our guess is that automakers are hedging their bets. Not because they think consumer demand in the U.S. will suddenly pick up, but because they expect a future Democratic administration to restart massive EV subsidies and reimpose EV mandates.
Congress can step in to protect consumers no matter who is president by doing one simple thing: Repeal the misbegotten and outdated Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, which was enacted during a bogus “energy crisis” and which gave the government the power to mandate EV sales by imposing ever-stricter mileage standards.
Consumers, not lawmakers or bureaucrats, should always be in the driver’s seat when it comes to what kind of cars they can buy.
— Written by the I&I Editorial Board
Support Independent Journalism
Issues & Insights was founded by seasoned journalists from the IBD Editorials page. Our mission is to provide timely, fact-based reporting and deeply informed analysis on the news of the day — without fear or favor.
We’re doing this on a voluntary basis because we believe in a free press and because we aren’t afraid to tell the truth, even if it means being targeted by the left.
We are 100% reader supported!!
If you like what you see, please feel free to donate.
And be sure to tell your friends!
I & I Editorial Board
The Issues and Insights Editorial Board has decades of experience in journalism, commentary and public policy.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
