In a remarkably efficient 12 minutes, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger told Americans quite a bit—less about the formal trappings of the State of the Union, and much more about what the 2026 political cycle is likely to be about.
Before getting to her address, some background is useful.
Former House Freedom Caucus Chairman Bob Good, who served in Congress with Spanberger, has noted the significance of her political rise and the strength of her alliances.
Those coattails were on full display when former President Barack Obama visited the Norfolk area with Spanberger in the closing days of the gubernatorial race, a move that appeared to give her at least a four-point boost in the final vote tally.
Spanberger’s Roadmap
Turning to the address itself, Spanberger made several things clear about her roadmap for 2026.
First, affordability will remain a central campaign issue, just as it was during the 2025 Virginia General Assembly session and the gubernatorial race.
But she also signaled something deeper. While affordability may be the pretext, the subtext of the coming campaign will be a familiar one: President Donald Trump and his allies in Congress, she argues, are acting not in the public interest, but to enrich themselves.
It’s a classic political playbook—back to the future, really.
2107 All Over Again
We’ve heard this before. It feels like 2017 all over again, complete with a revival of themes tied to the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.
Of course, no one actually uses that term on the campaign trail, because most Americans don’t know what it means. What they do recognize, however, is the idea of politicians using power for personal gain—and that’s the message being repackaged.
Which brings us to the optics. The goal was clear: to present Spanberger in a presidential light, framed by a supportive crowd applauding on cue. Visuals matter, and this was carefully choreographed politics.
What’s interesting in this moment is the contrast with recent history.
In 2022, shortly after then-Gov. Glenn Youngkin took the oath of office, Senate President Pro Tempore Louise Lucas launched a steady drumbeat of criticism, accusing Youngkin of using the governorship as a stepping stone for an inevitable presidential run.
Spanberger for President?
So the question now is this: What happens if, a year or so from now, Abigail Spanberger announces an exploratory committee?
You know how it goes—careful language, plausible deniability, and just enough ambiguity to test the waters without admitting that both feet are already in.
If Spanberger turns out to be the one using the governor’s office as a springboard to national ambitions, what will Louise Lucas say then?